*  RESEARCH --› biofield scanner (2008 - 2009)

Principle of function of bio-field scanner, technical documentation
Examples of shapes of scanned bio-fields
Special measurements of the bio-influent field of electric mains
Impact of the bio-influent field of a mobile phone
Protection from the mobile phone bio-influent field with a BAROQAL protective element
Surging of energy field of the probe following a Wi-Fi aerial exposition
Protection from Wi-Fi bio-influent field with a BAROQAL protective element
Effect of the activated diamond crystal ADiK
An impact of a nearby person and associated elements BAROQAL, PU on the probe
Basic homeopathy conditions
The impact of the mobile phone bio-influent field on an energy field of a homeopathic medication
Surging of a biofield of an emotionally disturbed person superimposed on the measuring curve
Elimination of impact of geophysical anomalies with the use of the PU protective element

Surging of energy field of the probe following a Wi-Fi aerial exposition

Fig. 1
Basic measurement - probe's own energy field (t = 0 min)

Fig. 2
The probe following the exposition to the aerial working within the Wi-Fi spectrum. (t = 9 min)

Fig. 3
Control measurements of the probe energy field 24 minutes after the exposition.

Fig. 4
Control measurements of the probe energy field 59 minutes after the exposition.

Fig. 5
Control measurements of the probe's energy filed 1 hour 49 minutes from the exposition - registered stable condition

Fig. 6
A new exposition 2 hours 4 minutes after the first exposition.




The measuring probe was placed 30 cm from the printer in the area where there usually are two operators. The printer in a Wi-Fi mode was switched on and off 3 times which is negligible fraction of a normal exposition during operation. The energy field of the probe started to surge following an exposition to an aerial working in the Wi-Fi spectrum. This surging was suppressed only two hours after a technically negligible exposition.
The stabilisation of the energy field of the mobile phone is despite its significantly higher transmission power about 50% shorter. The effects of the energy fields of the transmitters discovered by measurements were in contrast to the physical view of the electromagnetic field, intensity and transmission power. The significantly weaker Wi-Fi transmitter appears to be significantly more harmful then a mobile phone.
The discovered surging is correlated to previously published experiments based on EAV that were carried out before the biofield scanner existed.


(examples of surges in values for thyroids and pituitary glands 10 seconds after a call from a mobile phone)