RESEARCH --› biofield scanner (2008 - 2009)
Principle of function of bio-field scanner, technical documentationExamples of shapes of scanned bio-fieldsSpecial measurements of the bio-influent field of electric mainsImpact of the bio-influent field of a mobile phoneProtection from the mobile phone bio-influent field with a BAROQAL protective elementSurging of energy field of the probe following a Wi-Fi aerial expositionProtection from Wi-Fi bio-influent field with a BAROQAL protective elementEffect of the activated diamond crystal ADiKAn impact of a nearby person and associated elements BAROQAL, PU on the probe Basic homeopathy conditionsThe impact of the mobile phone bio-influent field on an energy field of a homeopathic medicationSurging of a biofield of an emotionally disturbed person superimposed on the measuring curveElimination of impact of geophysical anomalies with the use of the PU protective element
Surging of energy field of the probe following a Wi-Fi aerial exposition
Basic measurement - probe's own energy field
(t = 0 min)
The probe following the exposition to the aerial working within the Wi-Fi spectrum.
(t = 9 min)
Control measurements of the probe energy field 24 minutes after the exposition.
Control measurements of the probe energy field 59 minutes after the exposition.
Control measurements of the probe's energy filed 1 hour 49 minutes
from the exposition - registered stable condition
A new exposition 2 hours 4 minutes after the first exposition.
The measuring probe was placed 30 cm from the printer in the area where there usually
are two operators. The printer in a Wi-Fi mode was switched on and off 3 times
which is negligible fraction of a normal exposition during operation. The energy
field of the probe started to surge following an exposition to an aerial working
in the Wi-Fi spectrum. This surging was suppressed only two hours after a
technically negligible exposition.
The stabilisation of the energy field of the mobile phone is despite its
significantly higher transmission power about 50% shorter. The effects of
the energy fields of the transmitters discovered by measurements were in
contrast to the physical view of the electromagnetic field, intensity and
transmission power. The significantly weaker Wi-Fi transmitter appears to
be significantly more harmful then a mobile phone.
The discovered surging is correlated to previously published experiments
based on EAV that were carried out before the biofield scanner existed.
(examples of surges in values for thyroids and pituitary glands 10 seconds after a call from a mobile phone)